tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2678997279340818771.post8537178755798753927..comments2011-01-26T07:48:54.874+00:00Comments on Protect The Racecourse: CLEARLY REDUNDANTThe Collectivehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07623843652541403181noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2678997279340818771.post-39061220601897401062009-10-21T23:09:57.379+00:002009-10-21T23:09:57.379+00:00Aye, sterling work Tommy T !
The Wolverhampton Lo...Aye, sterling work Tommy T !<br /><br />The Wolverhampton Local Plan makes for interesting reading. We might not be legal land planning experts, but we can sure sniff out a good LDP when we see one !Tinker Tailor Soldier Spyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00309106856631967470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2678997279340818771.post-68264828875411071822009-10-21T21:22:29.239+00:002009-10-21T21:22:29.239+00:00Also some interesting blog posts from Tommy Tainan...Also some interesting blog posts from Tommy Tainant on his blog:<br /><br />http://blogs.myspace.com/tommytainantProper Tidyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06759755693852228926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2678997279340818771.post-66318286849286147912009-10-21T20:42:36.451+00:002009-10-21T20:42:36.451+00:00It is certainly open to interpretation isn't i...It is certainly open to interpretation isn't it!<br /><br />A legitimate concern is that potentially a future owner of the stadium - which is already owned by a holding company - could a) evict the club, b) force the club out by levying an excessive rent, or even c) encourage the club to move out 'temporarily' whilst development is undertaken, and by the letter of the law, or rather the LDP, the 'facility' would be defined as 'clearly redundant'.<br /><br />I would like to see much more than this - I would like to see an explicit legal statement from the Local Authority that they would resist any development, under any circumstances, that affects the use of the Racecourse as a football ground, and that the Local Authority would only allow development of the land in the future after public consultation and the agreement of all stakeholders - which means supporters groups and individual fans as well as shareholders,Proper Tidyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06759755693852228926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2678997279340818771.post-74579852431585852812009-10-21T20:19:11.180+00:002009-10-21T20:19:11.180+00:00obviously if the wrexham had moved grounds then th...obviously if the wrexham had moved grounds then the racecourse would be redundant, although the chances of them having the money to move grounds before even thinking about what to do with the old one is nil.<br /><br />i think clearly redudnant would not really apply in this case, it would be more applicible in the case of the bowling green at the miners in town for example<br /><br />but then again the WCBC planning department aren't very competent so they could use that description as they saw fit. ProbablyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com